Switch to ADA Accessible Theme Close Menu
Colvin, Saenz, Rodriguez & Kennamer, L.L.P.
Get in Touch Today! 956-542-7441

Monthly Archives: May 2019

Legal8

FDA Makes Major Announcement Halting Sales of Medical Device Pelvic Mesh

By Colvin, Saenz, Rodriguez & Kennamer L.L.P. |

On April 16, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) made a significant announcement concerning the medical device known as the pelvic mesh. Specifically, the FDA ordered all medical device companies still selling the product to stop sales and distribution throughout the United States. The product was manufactured and has been used since the 1970s… Read More »

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Copyright5

U.S. Supreme Court Makes Landmark—and Long Overdue—Copyright Infringement Decision

By Colvin, Saenz, Rodriguez & Kennamer L.L.P. |

On March 4, the U.S. Supreme Court made a landmark decision finally bringing copyright law in line with patent and trademark law. Specifically, the Court ruled that, in order for a business or other part to sue for copyright infringement, the copyright owner must have their Federal Copyright Registration in possession, i.e. completed.  Until… Read More »

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
ProdLiab2

U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Product Manufacturers Can Be Held Liable for Third-Party Modifications in Maritime Law Context

By Colvin, Saenz, Rodriguez & Kennamer L.L.P. |

On March 19, the U.S. Supreme Court made an important decision regarding products liability and the ability for permits manufacturers to be sued for modifications made to their products by third parties. The lawsuit was brought by two veterans who alleged that they were injured by the asbestos present in the Navy equipment they… Read More »

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Contract6

Texas Supreme Court Reinforces the Importance of the Contract

By Colvin, Saenz, Rodriguez & Kennamer L.L.P. |

The Texas Supreme Court recently made an important decision concerning oral representations made after two parties have already entered into a formal contract. Ultimately, the Court’s decision was that a party may not justifiably rely on oral misrepresentations made by another party when those misrepresentations are already contradicted by the terms of a contract… Read More »

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn